Yana_rumyanceva@mail.ru
call
write
Рус
En

International Legal
Aid Center

Cases won

Our experience — your victory! We have successfully won hundreds of cases defending clients ' interests in complex legal disputes. Trust the professionals with proven results!

Receive counselling
Family dispute cases won
Our lawyers achieve justice for clients by successfully resolving disputes in arbitration, family, property and other cases. Experience, strategy and "professionalism" are the key to your victory!

  • Case Number:
    2-7516/2022
    (shared section
    acquired property)
    1. Court: Nevsky District Court of St. Peteburg
    2. Who was represented: the plaintiff.
    3. The plaintiff appealed to the court with a claim to the Defendant for the division of jointly owned property. The defendant filed a counterclaim.
    4. Bottom line: The claim was denied.
    5. Appeal: 33-22616 / 2024 The plaintiff disagreed with the district court's decision and appealed to the court of appeal with an appeal
    6. Outcome of the appeal: The decision was left unchanged, the complaint was dismissed
  • Case number:
    2-1466 / 2024
    (family disputes)

    1. Court: Kolpinsky District Court of St. Petersburg.
    2. Who was represented: the plaintiff.
    3. The plot of the case: a claim for establishing paternity.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.
  • Case Number:
    2-2164/2023
    (family disputes)

    1. Court: Kolpinsky District Court of St. Petersburg.
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff.
    3. The plot of the case: a claim for establishing paternity.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.


  • Case Number:
    2-3492/2023
    (family disputes)

    1. Court: Kolpinsky District Court of St. Petersburg.
    2. Who was represented: the plaintiff.
    3. The plot of the case: a claim for recovery of alimony.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.
  • Case Number:
    2-5143/2023
    (family disputes)

    1. Court: Nevsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The responden
    3. Plot: the child was in the baby's house, the wife went to court to collect alimony and deprive her husband of parental rights.
    4. Bottom line: The claim was denied
    5. Appeal: 33-17141 / 2024
    6. The plaintiff filed an appeal against the decision of the Nevsky District Court.
    7. Outcome of the appeal: leaving the decision unchanged, the complaint without satisfaction
  • Case Number:
    2-10805/2022
    (family disputes)


    1. Court: Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg.
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff.
    3. Plot: The plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against the defendant for not obstructing their communication with their grandchildren and establishing a procedure for communicating with their grandchildren.
    4. Bottom line: partially satisfy the claims.

  • Case Number:
    2-1016/2020
    (family disputes)
    1. Court: judicial district No. 50 Spb
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: the spouse did not give the divorce, there was an appeal (appealed the divorce), thereby delaying the process. She motivated me by the fact that the issue of alimony and the procedure for communicating with the child was not resolved.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied, the appeal is dismissed
    5. Appeal: 11-116/2021
    Bottom line: left unchanged
  • Case Number:
    2-301/2022
    (family disputes)


    1. Court: Kalininsky District Court of St. Petersburg.
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff.
    3. Plot: a claim for determining the order of communication with the child. The defendant refused to communicate with the child completely.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.
    5. Appeal: 33-16460/2022
    Solution: solution without modification.
  • Case Number:
    2-443/2022
    (family disputes)

    1. Court: Kalininsky District Court of St. Petersburg.
    2. Who was represented: the respondent.
    3. Plot: the spouse declared the recovery of funds for the maintenance of the child in the amount of 150 thousand rubles. The defendant offered alimony in the amount of 30 thousand rubles. 29 thousand rubles (two months) were granted.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is partially satisfied.
    5. Appeal: 33-883 / 2023; 33-23807 / 2023.
    Decision: left unchanged, the complaint is not satisfied.
  • Case Number: -
    (family disputes)


    1. Court: Judicial district No. 72 of St. Petersburg.
    2. Who was represented: the plaintiff.
    3. Plot: a claim for divorce. It is not known where the spouse was located, his consent was absent, and he was not a citizen of the Russian Federation.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.
  • Case Number:
    2-4613/2023
    (family disputes)

    1. Court: Judicial precinct No. 28 St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: a claim for divorce. The parties were not against it, the defendant was a foreign citizen.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied
  • Case Number:
    2-4613/2023
    (family disputes)

    1. Court: Judicial precinct No. 28 St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: a claim for divorce. The parties were not against it, the defendant was a foreign citizen.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied
  • Номер дела:
    2-3005/2023
    (семейные споры)

    1. Court: Judicial precinct No. 344 of the Lyuberetsky Judicial District of the Moscow Region
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: A claim for divorce. The parties agreed, but were located outside the Russian Federation.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied
  • Case Number:-
    (family disputes)


    1. Court: Judicial precinct No. 195 St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: Plaintiff
    3. Plot: a claim for divorce, the parties agreed
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied
Successful cases in inheritance disputes
  • Case Number:
    2-9707/2024
    (hereditary
    disputes)

    1. Court: Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The respondent
    3. Plot: claim for recognition of property as personal property.
    4. Bottom line: Denied the claim.
  • Case Number:
    2-3440/2012
    (hereditary
    disputes)

    1. Court: Vsevolozhsk City Court of the Leningrad Region
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: The plaintiff filed a claim with the court, in which, taking into account the clarifications, he asked to include in the inheritance mass after the death of his father, the property belonging to the latter during his lifetime, namely: a residential house and a garage, to recognize his ownership in the amount of 1/4 of the share in the ownership of the residential house and garage.
    4. Bottom line: The claim was dismissed.
    5. Appeal: 33-16 / 2013
    6. Plot: The plaintiff asks the decision of the Vsevolozhsk City Court of 12.09.2012 to cancel and adopt a new decision on the satisfaction of his claims, referring to the court's incorrect assessment of the circumstances of the case.
    7. Bottom line: the decision of the Vsevolozhsk City Court of the Leningrad region to cancel, making a new decision on the case.
  • Case Number:
    33-5084/2025
    (hereditary
    disputes)
    1. Court: Saint Petersburg City Court
    2. Who was represented: The respondent
    3. Plot: a dispute that arose in connection with the division of jointly acquired property of the deceased on 17.01.2022 and the Defendant, based on Articles 39, 173 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, Article 38 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation, including property in the inheritance mass, based on Article 1150 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
    4. Bottom line: a settlement agreement was concluded.
  • Case Number:
    2-3720/2017
    (hereditary
    disputes)

    1. Court: Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: the plaintiff
    3. Plot: a claim to establish the fact of acceptance of inheritance, invalidation of the certificate of inheritance right under the law, recognition of ownership of residential premises. The plaintiff indicated that after the death of his wife, inherited property remained in the form of an apartment, and he is the heir of the first stage. However, the plaintiff missed the 6-month deadline for accepting the inheritance, but actually accepted it, since he uses this apartment, pays all expenses for the maintenance of real estate and utility bills.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.
  • Case Number:
    2-5841/2024
    (hereditary
    disputes)

    1. Court: Kirovsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: the respondent
    3. Plot: a claim to challenge paternity, to establish the fact of recognition of paternity
    4. Bottom line: refusal to consider the case.
  • Case Number:
    2-1054/2020
    (hereditary
    disputes)

    1. Court: Petrodvorets District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: The plaintiff applied to the court with an application to establish the fact of accepting the inheritance after the death of her mother.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.
Successful cases in housing disputes
  • Case Number:
    2-438/2010
    (housing disputes)

    1. Court: Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: A claim for recognition as having lost the right to use residential premises. The defendant did not live in the premises, did not pay, and was absent for a long time. Despite the lack of registration at the place of residence in another place, he was removed from the register
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.
  • Case Number:
    2-3783/2021
    (housing disputes)

    1. Court: Nevsky District Court
    2. Who was expected: The plaintiff
    3. The plot of the case: a claim for recognition as having lost the right to use residential premises and eviction, recovery of court costs
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.

  • Case Number:
    2-454/2021
    (housing disputes)
    1. Court: Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: the plaintiff Plot: the plaintiff asked to recognize her right to acquire ownership of a land plot, oblige the Property Relations Committee of St. Petersburg to eliminate the violated right of the plaintiff to receive free ownership of the specified land plot with the necessary actions to prepare documents for registration of ownership rights, including making a decision on preliminary approval of the provision of land the land plot.
    3. Bottom line: the claim was denied
    4. Appeal: 33-29942 / 2021 plaintiff's appeal against the decision of the Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    5. Bottom line: the Court of Appeal satisfied the claims.
  • Case number:
    2-12352 / 2022
    (housing disputes)

    1. Court: Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The respondent
    3. Plot: the dispute was about moving a minor into an apartment. The defendant did not want to move the child in
    4. Bottom line: the claim was dismissed
    5. Appeal: 33-33104 / 2024 The plaintiff did not agree with the decision of the district court and filed an appeal against the decision of the Primorsky District Court
    6. Outcome of the appeal: Leaving the decision unchanged, the complaint without satisfaction.
Successful consumer rights cases
  • Case Number:
    2-20798/2016
    (construction)


    1. Court: Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: On consumer protection-from contracts in the field of construction and related engineering services
    4. Bottom line: The claims were partially satisfied.
  • Case Number:
    2-8032/2018
    (consumer rights)


    1. Court: Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Evropeysky Dom LLC for consumer rights protection and, taking into account the clarification of the claims in accordance with Article 39 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, asks for damages in the amount of 146,200 rubles, a penalty in the amount of 146,200 rubles for violation of the term of performance of obligations, court costs in the amount of 70,000 rubles., compensation for non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 150,000 rubles, 50% fine in accordance with the provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation "on Consumer Rights Protection"
    4. Result: partially satisfy the claims. Recover from LLC "European House" in favor of Rogozhin FULL NAME17 losses on the elimination of construction defects in the amount of 146200 (one hundred and forty-six thousand two hundred) rubles, a penalty for violation of the deadline for eliminating defects for the period in the amount of 50,000 (fifty thousand) rubles, compensation for moral damage 5000 (five thousand) rubles, a fine of 100600 (one hundred thousand six hundred) rubles, the cost of paying for the services of a representative 20,000 (twenty thousand) rubles. The remaining part of the claim must be refused.
  • Case Number:
    2–23/2020-35
    (purchase of goods)


    1. Court: Justice of the Peace of the judicial district No. 35 St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: the plaintiff filed a claim against the defendant for consumer protection. The plaintiff asked to recover from the defendant money paid for low-quality goods in the amount of 20.000, a penalty in the amount of 34.200, a fine in the amount of 50% of the amount awarded by the court, compensation for non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 50.000, court costs in the amount of 30.000.
    4. Result: the justice of the peace partially satisfied the claims
    5. Appeal: 11-23 / 2021 Court: Vyborg District Court of St. Petersburg Plot: the defendant filed an appeal, disagreeing with the decision of the justice of the peace
    6. Bottom line: the decision to leave the appeal unchanged without satisfaction.
  • Case Number:
    02-7989/2023
    (air tickets)

    1. Court: Khoroshchevsky District Court of Moscow
    2. Who was represented: Plaintiff
    3. Plot: the plaintiff filed a lawsuit to recover the cost of air tickets, penalties, and consumer protection. The respondent agreed to provide a business class flight for one year instead of cash.
    4. Bottom line: a settlement agreement was concluded.
  • Case Number:
    2-4323/2024
    (online training)

    1. Court: Kuntsevsky District Court of Moscow
    2. Represented by: plaintiff
    3. Plot: The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, in which he asks:: - terminate the contract of educational services concluded between the plaintiff and LLC-Recover: money in the amount of the amount paid under the contract of educational services; - penalty in the amount of the amount for the period from 09.01.2023 to 26.01.2023, from 27.01.2023 to the date of actual execution of the court decision; - non-pecuniary damage in the amount of the sum-a fine in the amount of 50% of the amount awarded by the court; - losses in the amount of the sum
    4. Bottom line: Partially satisfy the claims. Recover from the LLC in favor of the Plaintiff money in the amount of 109,270. 64, a penalty in the amount of 19,968. 72, compensation for non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 3,000, a fine in the amount of 5, and in total recover 152,239. 36 To collect from the LLC in the budget revenue address state duty in the amount of 3,724 (three thousand seven hundred and twenty rubles) rubles.
Cases won CAS disputes



  • Case Number:
    2а-3088/2020

    1. Court: Vsevolozhsk City Court of the Leningrad Region
    2. Represented by: third party
    3. Plot: the plaintiff asks to recognize illegal the decision of the administrative defendant - Management of Rosreestr on registration of ownership of a share in the right of common shared ownership for FULL NAME3 on the house . As well as the obligation to exclude the record of registration of the right of shared ownership.
    4. Bottom line: The claim was denied.



  • Case Number:
    2а-1102/2024
    (illegal action of the bailiff)
    1. Court: Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: the plaintiff
    3. Plot: The bailiff imposed restrictions on driving a vehicle due to arrears on alliments, it was disputed, since the Plaintiff had work related to driving, this is the only source of income and the restriction of such a measure leads to the deprivation of the right to earn and pay alimony.
    4. Bottom line: The administrative claim is satisfied in full.


  • Case Number:
    2а-0536/2023
    (illegal inaction of the bailiff)
    1. Court: Nikulinsky District Court of Moscow
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: The plaintiff filed an administrative claim with the court, in which he asks to recognize illegal the inaction of the bailiff in the framework of enforcement proceedings, expressed in the failure to provide information and documents at the written request of the recoverer, as well as failure to perform the necessary enforcement actions to search for the debtor's property, in order to fully and timely execute the judicial act; oblige to provide complete and detailed information on all enforcement actions performed by the bailiff-executor in the specified enforcement proceedings, take measures to search for the Debtor's property and further arrest it for the purpose of subsequent sale of the property and execution of the court decision, copies of the decisions issued in the enforcement proceedings, as well as provide a certificate of the amounts of debt collected in the enforcement proceedings or the amount of debt on the current date.
    4. Result: To declare illegal the inaction of the bailiff on enforcement proceedings, expressed in the failure of the Plaintiff to provide information on the progress of enforcement proceedings, obliging to provide information on the proceedings. Refuse to meet the rest of the requirements.


  • Case Number:
    2а-7453/2021
    1. Court: Moscow District Court of St. Petersburg Who was represented: The plaintiff
    2. The plot of the case: the plaintiff filed an administrative claim with the court, asked to recognize the actions (inaction) of the bailiff as illegal, in particular on the improper notification of the administrative plaintiff about the decision on temporary restriction on the debtor's departure from the Russian Federation of 18.12.2019 and the decision on temporary restriction on the debtor's departure from the Russian Federation of 06.10.2020 in the framework of the enforcement order production facilities
    3. Bottom line: Satisfy the Plaintiff's administrative claim.
  • Case Number:
    2-10/2023-4
    (illegal actions
    bailiff)
    1. Court: Justice of the Peace of the judicial district No. 4
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: The plaintiff suffered losses in the amount of 37,349. 92 rubles due to illegal actions of the bailiff. Thus, the plaintiff purchased air tickets on the route worth 35,496 rubles. However, due to the ban imposed by the bailiff and improper notification of the imposition of restrictive measures, the Plaintiff was not able to use them. The air ticket was purchased by the plaintiff at a non-refundable rate, in connection with which the plaintiff could not return the money paid and suffered losses. In addition, the plaintiff paid insurance in the amount of 1,853. 92 rubles, the cost of which was also not returned to the plaintiff.
    4. Bottom line: The Plaintiff's claim for damages was denied
    5. Appeal: 11-426/2023 Court: Oktyabrsky District Court of Saint Petersburg
    6. Result: The decision of the Justice of the peace was overturned, a new decision on recovery of damages was made.
Cases won disputes with the bank
  • Case number:
    2-4055 / 2024
    (disputes with the bank)

    1. Court: Kirovsky District Court
    2. Who was represented: The respondent
    3. Plot: a loan agreement was concluded between PJSC "Bank Saint Petersburg" and the respondent, according to which funds were transferred to the respondent's bank account, in turn, the respondent assumed obligations to pay interest for the use of borrowed funds, as well as to return the funds within the terms established by the agreement. However, having received the money, he did not fulfill his obligations, and therefore a debt was formed. On 26.03.2020, Bank Saint Petersburg PJSC and M. B. A. Finance LLC entered into a contract of assignment of rights of claim.
    4. Bottom line: The court dismissed the claim due to the expiration of the statute of limitations.
  • Case Number:
    2-2354/2023
    (disputes with the bank)
    1. Court: Petrodvorets District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The respondent
    3. Plot: The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant, indicating that on 14.06.2022 a loan agreement no. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, the Bank provided the borrower with a loan for the purchase of a car.The defendant explained that the debt was repaid. Since the plaintiff sent a certificate to the court stating that the Defendant's debt was fully repaid as of 06.05.2024, recovery of the amount and foreclosure on the car are impossible.
    4. Bottom line: a settlement agreement was concluded
Successful cases in land disputes

  • Case Number:
    2-454/2021
    (land disputes)
    1. Court: Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: the plaintiff Plot: the plaintiff asked to recognize her right to acquire ownership of a land plot, oblige the Property Relations Committee of St. Petersburg to eliminate the violated right of the plaintiff to receive free ownership of the specified land plot with the necessary actions to prepare documents for registration of ownership rights, including making a decision on preliminary approval of the provision of land the land plot.
    3. Bottom line: the claim was denied
    4. Appeal: 33-29942 / 2021 plaintiff's appeal against the decision of the Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    5. Bottom line: the Court of Appeal satisfied the claims.

  • Case Number:
    2-5852/2022
    (land disputes)
    1. Court: Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: the plaintiff asked to recognize his right to acquire ownership of a land plot, oblige the Property Relations Committee of St. Petersburg to eliminate the violated right of the plaintiff to receive free ownership of the specified land plot with the necessary actions to prepare documents for registration of ownership rights,including making a decision on preliminary approval of the provision of land. In support of the claims, he refers to the fact that he has legal grounds for acquiring the above-mentioned land plots for free without bidding
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.

  • Case Number:
    2-1585/2023
    (land disputes)
    1. Court: Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff's
    3. Plot: the plaintiff asked to recognize her right to acquire ownership of a land plot, oblige the Property Relations Committee of St. Petersburg to eliminate the violated right of the plaintiff to receive free ownership of the specified land plot with the necessary actions to prepare documents for registration of ownership rights,including making a decision on preliminary approval of the provision of land. In support of the claims, he refers to the fact that he has legal grounds for acquiring the above-mentioned land plots for free without bidding
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.

  • Case Number:
    2-5821/2022
    (land disputes)
    1. Court: Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: Plaintiff
    3. Plot: the plaintiff asks to recognize her right to acquire ownership of a land plot, oblige the Property Relations Committee of St. Petersburg
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied.
Successful employment cases
  • Case number:
    2-454 / 2021
    (labor disputes)

    1. Court: Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: the plaintiff Plot: the plaintiff asked to recognize her right to acquire ownership of a land plot, oblige the Property Relations Committee of St. Petersburg to eliminate the violated right of the plaintiff to receive free ownership of the specified land plot with the necessary actions to prepare documents for registration of ownership rights, including making a decision on preliminary approval of the provision of land the land plot.
    3. Bottom line: the claim was denied
    4. Appeal: 33-29942 / 2021 plaintiff's appeal against the decision of the Krasnoselsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    5. Bottom line: the Court of Appeal satisfied the claims.

  • Case Number:
    2-2441/2021
    (labor disputes)

    1. Court: Kirovsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: the parties signed a contract for the purchase and sale of interior doors, as well as additional elements. In accordance with the Contract, delivery of the goods is made after the buyer pays 100 % of the cost of the goods. At the same time, the seller did not issue an invoice for payment, and the product was not prepared. In addition, the respondent indicated that it was impossible to fulfill the obligations under the contract. the court recovered the amount paid under the contract in the amount of 106,000 rubles, a penalty in the amount of 68,370 rubles, compensation for non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 5,000 rubles, a fine in the amount of 89,685 rubles, as well as court costs in the amount of 25,000 rubles.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is partially satisfied.

  • Case Number:
    2-1137/2022
    (labor disputes)

    1. Court: Frunzensky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: The plaintiff indicated that she worked for the defendant as a commercial director from 12.07.2020 to 23.11.2020, the salary was 60,000 rubles. 00 kopecks. For the period from 12.09.2020 to 23.11.2020, the defendant did not pay wages, the debt is 130,000 rubles. 00 kopecks. Considering their rights violated, the plaintiff asks to establish the fact of employment relations with the defendant in the period from 12.07.2020 to 23.11.2020, to recover from the defendant wage arrears in the amount of 130,000 rubles, compensation in accordance with Article 236 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation for the period from 02.10.2020 to the day of actual repayment of the debt, compensation for non-pecuniary damage in accordance with Article 237 of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation. of the Russian Federation in the amount of 10,000 rubles, impose the obligation to pay insurance contributions to the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation and the Social Insurance Fund for the period from 12.07.2020 to 23.11.2020.
    4. Bottom line: the claims were partially satisfied, and the defendant's appeals were returned.
Successful cases in customs disputes


  • Case Number:
    А52-4005/2024
    (customs disputes)

    1. Court: Commercial Court of Pskov Region
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Essence of the case: The plaintiff appealed to the Pskov Customs to declare illegal the act of checking documents and information after the release of goods and (or) vehicles, to recognize illegal decisions on making changes (additions) to the information stated in the declaration for goods, after the release of goods
    4. Bottom line: The claims are satisfied Appeal: The respondent (Customs) did not agree with the judicial act and filed an appeal, in which it asks the court to cancel the decision. In support of the complaint, he refers to the incorrect application by the court of first instance of the norms of substantive law. Notes that failure to submit properly completed certificates of origin of goods of the ST-2 form is an independent and sufficient reason for refusing to provide a free trade regime
    5. Outcome of the appeal: The Fourteenth Arbitration Court upheld the decision of the Pskov Region Arbitration Court in the case, and dismissed the appeal of the Pskov Customs.


  • Case Number:
    А40-72863/2024
    (customs disputes)

    1. Court: Moscow City Arbitration Court
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: the plaintiff declared illegal the decision of the Federal Pension Fund for the city of Moscow and the Moscow region to set the Plaintiff for 2023 the insurance rate for compulsory social insurance against industrial accidents and occupational diseases as a percentage of accrued wages on all grounds 2.5% to the amounts of payments and other remuneration that are accrued in favor of insured persons relationships.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is satisfied
Successful cases in various disputes


  • Case number:
    2-1304 / 2021
    (unjust enrichment)

    1. Court: Nikulinsky District Court of Moscow.
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff.
    3. Plot: The plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant to recover from the latter funds in the amount of 75,963. 11 rubles, paid at the time of filing the claim of the state fee in the amount of 2,479. 00 rubles, arguing that on April 11, 2019, he made an erroneous transfer of funds in the amount of 7,5500. 00 rubles from a bank card belonging to him.
    4. The result: To recover from the Defendant in favor of the Plaintiff unjustified enrichment in the amount of 75963.11 rubles, state duty in the amount of 2479.00 rubles, and total funds in the amount of 78442.11 (seventy-eight thousand four hundred and forty-two rubles eleven kopecks) rubles.


  • Case Number:
    2-2741/2024
    (support of construction organizations)

    1. Court: Petrogradsky District Court of Saint Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: Respondent
    3. Plot: A contract was concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant, under the terms of which the defendant undertook to perform the work. The plaintiff asked to recover from the defendant the cost of eliminating the shortcomings of the work performed.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is partially satisfied.


  • Case Number:
    А44-2509/2024
    (subsidiary liability)

    1. Court: Novgorod Commercial Court
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: the plaintiff and the defendant signed a contract for the purchase and sale of interior doors, as well as additional elements. Payment for the product was supposed to be made in stages. After making an advance payment, the obligations under the agreement must be fulfilled within 45 days, and the respondent has not fulfilled its obligations under the agreement.
    4. Bottom line: the claim is fully satisfied.


  • Case number:
    2-10275 / 2021
    (IT disputes)

    1. Court: Moscow District Court of Saint Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot of the case: The plaintiff filed a lawsuit for termination of the contract for the development of the site, for recovery of funds paid under this contract in the amount of 300,000 rubles, as well as in accordance with the amended Article 39 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation edition, for recovery of interest for the use of other people's funds for the period in the amount of 53,657. 45 rubles
    4. Bottom line: Terminate the site development contract concluded between the Defendant and the Plaintiff. Collect from the Defendant in favor of the Plaintiff the funds paid under the site development agreement in the amount of 300,000 rubles, and refuse to satisfy the claim for collecting interest for using other people's funds for the period in the amount of 53,657. 45 rubles –


  • Case number:
    5-258 / 2017
    (accident disputes)

    1. Court: Sestroretsky District Court of St. Petersburg
    2. Who was represented: The plaintiff
    3. Plot: The plaintiff left the scene of the accident. A decision was made to terminate the proceedings in the administrative offense case. Absence of elements of an administrative offense
    4. Bottom line: a decision was made to terminate the proceedings in the case of an administrative offense. No evidence of an administrative offense.
Contact us!
Ask a question or make an appointment for a "consultation" — we are "always in touch" and " ready to help!


Our contacts:
+7 (921)958-83-15

Е-mail:
Yana_rumyanceva@mail.ru

Our address:
Russia Saint Petersburg,
Kolomyazhsky Prospekt, 15 building 2


Receive counselling
PRIVACY POLICY
CONSENT TO THE PROCESSING OF PERSONAL DATA
PUBLIC OFFER

AK Yana Olegovna Rumyantseva

All rights reserved

©2012-2025



All photos, texts, and videos belong to their respective owners and are used for demonstration purposes. Please do not use the template content for commercial purposes.